Hospital
RSSArticles
-
New SACHRP member brings legal and bioethical perspective to board
IRB Advisor asked Holly Fernandez Lynch, JD, MBioethics, executive director of the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, to discuss her role in joining the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP). Before joining the Petrie-Flom Center, Lynch was a senior policy and research analyst for the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues’ report on the Guatemala STD inoculation study.
-
NIH issues guidance promoting central IRB use
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is officially promoting the use of a single IRB for large, multisite clinical trials.
-
SUPPORT study that started controversy was complicated
A study called SUPPORT, short for Surfactant, Positive Pressure, and Oxygenation Randomized Trial, was a major reason behind recent draft guidance published by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).
-
Standard of Care Draft Guidance Praised, Criticized
Weighing in on a recent standard of care guidance published by the Office for Human Research Protections.
-
Hospital Compare may slow price increases
While previous studies have failed to prove that access to quality information from public reporting sites such as Hospital Compare can be an impetus for hospitals to improve quality of care, a study published in the January issue of Health Affairs indicates it may have an impact on prices.1
-
Behavioral health and hospital costs
When you think about it, it’s not the fact that’s surprising, but the extent. In 13 New Jersey hospitals, a third of all hospital costs were associated with behavioral health issues, such as substance abuse or mental illness. Even more alarming, the report by the Rutgers University Center for State Health Policy noted that three-fourths of the highest users of hospital services were afflicted with behavioral health conditions, compared to about a third of those who were not considered high users of services.
-
Patient safety on the night shift
The floors are quiet, patients are asleep, and residents are trying to either catch some shut-eye or catch up on paperwork. The rush of the evening hours in the emergency department has ended. Yet the wee hours of the morning — 4 a.m. to 7 a.m. — are when doctors think the hospital is at its least safe, according to a new study.1
-
Leadership Involvement Improves Quality
A study looks at quality improvement and patient safety, and how they trickled down to actual quality of care and outcomes.
-
The conflict between quality and patient experience
Imagine you are trying desperately to reduce your fall rate and you have instituted a program with bed alarms for patients who meet certain criteria. You may find yourself really pleased to note a reduction in falls, but at the same time you are noticing your patient satisfaction scores are taking a hit. Patients are talking about the noise of alarms, of feeling infantilized, of their sense of control being taken away. Is there a link? Maybe, according to an editorial in the American Journal of Medical Quality.1
-
Less harm done in 2013, says AHRQ
The data look so good for the headlines: in 2012-2013, hospital-acquired conditions such as urinary tract infections and falls fell by 9%, saving about $8 billion. Stretching back another year, to 2011, the total cost savings reached an estimated $12 billion, with about 1.3 million cases of harm and 50,000 deaths prevented. All this good news came in a December report released by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).