Skip to main content

All Access Subscription

Get unlimited access to our full publication and article library.

Get Access Now

Interested in Group Sales? Learn more

ED Legal Letter

RSS  

Articles

  • How can expert witnesses make or break a lawsuit?

    The credibility of "dueling experts" testifying before a jury often determines the outcome of a lawsuit alleging malpractice by an emergency physician, but in fact, expert witnesses typically get involved weeks before a case is even filed.
  • Emergency Department Triage— The New Hotbed of Litigation?

    Historically, emergency department (ED) triage was rarely a high-risk issue for hospitals, primarily because short waiting times resulted in all patients being seen quickly by the emergency physicians. Today, the combination of overcrowding, markedly prolonged waiting times, increasing numbers of patients leaving the ED before examination, the nursing shortage, diminishing financial support, and federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) mandates make triage a very dangerous encounter for the patient and a fertile source of litigation against providers.
  • Special Report: Legal Special Defenses: An ED Physician's Friend, and Sometimes Savior

    We should all be aware of the four components of malpractice the physician had a duty, breached the duty, there was harm to the patient, and the harm was caused by the breach of duty.
  • Need an expert witness? Here's what to look for

    Every trial usually comes down to a "battle of the experts," with the jury judging the credibility of the experts and making their decision. Consider these important factors, advises Linda M. Stimmel, a partner with the Dallas, TX-based law firm of Stewart Stimmel: Experience, education, training, the effectiveness of how the expert communicates with the jurors, and the bedside manner of the expert. "Even how the expert is dressed may affect their credibility."
  • Time-dependent treatments give rise to ED lawsuits

    This is the second of a two-part series on delayed diagnoses in the ED. This month, we report on legal risks involving time-dependent medications and interventions.
  • Sexual Comments, Behavior Create Minefield in the Health Care Setting

    Interactions in the clinical setting that involve sexually related comments or behavior, personal relationships, or physical examination of private areas of a patient's body must be handled with sensitivity and good judgment to avoid potential liability.
  • Risks rising for 'delayed diagnosis' ED litigation

    This is the first of a two-part series on delayed diagnosis in the ED. This month, we cover general liability risks and documentation. Next month, we'll report on why legal risks involving time-dependent medications and interventions are increasing.
  • Could photographing an ED patient get you sued?

    Photographs of ED patients' clinical findings are being taken more frequently, due to the ubiquity of digital cameras, increasing use of electronic medical records, and their recognized value in medical education. However, patients who are to be photographed should be informed of the photography and given an opportunity for informed consent.
  • Special Report: Smoothing Legal Rough Waters with Mediation

    The format of this article deviates somewhat from the usual style of footnotes sustaining the assertions of the article, because the purpose of this essay is to provide an introduction to alternative methods of dispute resolution in the healthcare field, which will be further examined in future articles.
  • ED Discussions after Patient Death Not Covered by Peer Review Privilege

    Jason Rinehart presented to the emergency department (ED) of Akron General Medical Center with nausea, vomiting, and back pain.1 No definitive diagnosis was made, and the patient was discharged with medications to control his symptoms. He died hours after discharge, and an autopsy revealed an aortic dissection as the cause of death.