Skip to main content

All Access Subscription

Get unlimited access to our full publication and article library.

Get Access Now

Interested in Group Sales? Learn more

ED Legal Letter

RSS  

Articles

  • Special Report: Non-Accidental or Accidental Trauma - Maybe, Maybe Not?

    Over the years, emergency medicine physicians and pediatricians have been sued many times for failure to recognize and report non-accidental trauma and vulnerable children. Unfortunately, there are a number of ways to go wrong when it comes to reporting child abuse, and there are three recognized liability issues: A liability for failure to report suspected abuse, liability for reporting suspected abuse and liability for unauthorized release of confidential information during the course of reporting.
  • Documentation could lead to a courtroom 'save'

    In a testicular torsion case, consistent and clear documentation by both ED nurses and physicians of the complaint, the onset of the problem and the examination of the patient placed the patient outside the timeframe where any medical intervention would have lead to a different result.
  • Sixth Circuit: Admission to the Hospital Does Not End EMTALA Liability

    The case of Moses v. Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Inc. could be the tipping point that finally puts to rest the oft-repeated mantra of the civil courts that "EMTALA is not a federal malpractice law."
  • Special Report: Helicopter Shopping and the Interfacility Transfer of Patients

    A rural hospital contacts an air medical service (AMS) provider to transfer by helicopter a patient with blunt trauma. The distance between the sending and receiving facility is 75 miles. The "Life Flight" helicopter crew receives the request at 00:00, and departs their base at 00:20. They abort the flight at 00:40 hours, 10 miles from the sending facility, because the cloud ceiling drops to 700 feet, 300 feet below the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) minimum for night flight by helicopters. The sending facility then calls another AMS provider and requests that the patient be transported to the same receiving facility.
  • EMRs: A 'plaintiff's dream'? reduce your risks

    When an ED physician was sued for allegedly missing signs and symptoms of a subarachnoid hemorrhage, the emergency medical record (EMR) documentation that was brought into evidence didn't help matters.
  • 'Against Medical Advice' in the ED: Where We Are in 2009

    In light of the existing health care crisis, patients who leave the emergency department (ED) against medical advice (AMA) will foreseeably represent an increasing population of emergency patients. Despite this, these patients have attracted little academic interest within the emergency medicine literature.
  • A blood culture result comes back positive: What are your legal risks?

    Four blood cultures come back positive, but when an ED nurse contacts the woman's husband, he says she's doing much better. Neither the ED nurse nor the physician asks the patient to return to the ED, and she returns two days later with altered mental status and partially treated meningitis. An adverse outcome results. Could your ED be sued?
  • Personal communications can be discoverable

    Your own personal notes about a patient's care. Incident reports if a patient is harmed. Information given verbally or in writing to the hospital's risk managers. Conversations or e-mails with other ED physicians about the patient's care. E-mails or conversation with physicians who don't work in your ED. Personal correspondence with non-involved parties.
  • In danger of being sued? Don't go into denial

    If it ever happens to you, it's a moment you'll never forgetbeing served with papers from a patient's attorney. What do you do first?
  • Special Report: Of Tourniquets and Arbitrations

    A recently arbitrated case presents a starting off point for a discussion regarding a commonly applied dressing and a frequently used but often misunderstood method of resolving medial malpractice disputes.