All
RSSArticles
-
EPs Named in Med/Mal Lawsuits Receive Higher Patient Experience Scores
-
Plaintiffs Use Loss of Chance to Prevail in ED Malpractice Claim
Plaintiff attorneys do not always need to prove that an EP’s negligence directly caused a patient’s bad outcome. Instead, they allege only that the plaintiff was deprived of the possibility of a better outcome. Often, these “loss of chance” claims involve missed or delayed diagnosis of stroke.
-
Analysis of Stroke Malpractice Cases Reveals Reason for ED Diagnostic Errors
Breakdowns in the initial patient-provider encounter were the most frequent source of diagnostic error in ischemic stroke malpractice cases, according to the authors of a recent analysis.
-
Emergency Medicine Specialty Most Likely to be Named in Acute Stroke Malpractice Claims
Emergency physicians (EPs) are the specialty most likely to be sued in acute stroke cases, according to a recent analysis. One-third of malpractice claims named EPs. In contrast, neurologists were named in just 17% of claims.
-
Research Shows Effectiveness of Antibacterial LEDs
Research indicates visible-light continuous environmental disinfection can be effective in combatting microbial surface contamination and surgical site infections.
-
Continuous Visible Lighting Disinfection May Offer Benefits
New Mexico facility takes unique approach to infection control and prevention.
-
Patient Safety Act Offers Peer Review Protections
If one proceeds carefully, much information gathered can be protected from the prying eyes of plaintiffs’ attorneys.
-
Hospital Fires Doctor for Verbal Attack During Peer Review
In an unusual case illustrating the potential legal exposure associated with the process, a hospital fired a physician reviewer for “verbally attacking” a colleague at a peer review meeting. The fired doctor sued.
-
Investigate Thoroughly, Follow HCQIA Standards in Disciplinary Process
Once an allegation is made against a healthcare practitioner that will require peer review, it is important to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation. The caregiver should be informed of the issues of concern in writing and provided the opportunity to respond to the concerns of the professional review bodies. Where appropriate, outside experts can be helpful in objectively evaluating clinical issues.
-
Avoid Legal Pitfalls in Peer Review Process With Bylaws, HCQIA Standards
The peer review process can be a legal mine field, with missteps exposing the hospital and health system to allegations that result in significant liability. Reduce that risk by knowing the common mistakes and using best practices to keep the review above reproach.