Skip to main content

Communication of a diversion message

Communication of a diversion message

When communicating your diversion message, the following questions must be answered, according to James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP, CEO of Premier Health Care Services, a Dayton, OH-based physician management group that provides ED staffing and consulting.

Why is the diversion occurring? It could be due to:

  • safety reasons;
  • ED compromised;
  • certain hospital services unavailable;
  • CT scan;
  • monitored beds;
  • critical care beds;
  • dialysis, etc.;
  • labor and delivery;
  • a "nearby" hospital not compromised in its ability to deliver care.

Who is diverted? This list might include:

  • all patients;
  • care can take place temporarily in "parking lot" with rendezvous with on-site transport vehicles;
  • no care can occur; facility and ED staff fully compromised;
  • message must go out by EMS channels plus to the general public through the media;
  • EMS patients;
  • all EMS patients;
  • patients who have an identified need that EMS personnel can recognize;
  • all monitored patients;
  • all trauma patients;
  • all critical care patients
  • all patients who may require CT scan (strokes, head injury);
  • all patients utilizing a special hospital service, such as dialysis and labor and delivery, which is compromised.

How large a population and EMS system will be affected?

  • Diversions from a regional referral center, such as the children’s hospital, the trauma center, or the burn center, will need to be communicated widely.
  • A hospital isolated in a large geographic area will be more difficult to divert.

What are the legal implications?

  • Care compromise is not as defensible if uncompromised care is available for a patient within a reasonable transport time.
  • Diversion policy must be developed and applied consistently and not subject to real or perceived financial motivation.
  • Diversion, rendezvous, and transfer incidents each have EMTALA implications. Documentation should support medical judgment, clear communications, consistency, and lack of financial motivation.

How long will diversion last? It could last:

  • a foreseeable and predictable time frame that is short (hours);
  • an unknown but short time frame (hours);
  • an unknown and lengthy time frame (structural collapse from an earthquake).

How will message be communicated and to whom? Communication could include:

  • other surrounding EDs (by phone, fax, radio, or electronic interchange);
  • local EMS;
  • regional EMS;
  • general public media;
  • physician offices.

Is the ED physician medical control able to override the diversion decision? Options include:

  • no, as in situations in which the ED is unsafe;
  • yes, when the ED physician can assist in patient care in locations such as the parking lot;
  • yes, when the ED can accommodate the patient, then arrange transport to another hospital;
  • yes, when the ED physician can arrange a rendezvous with a skilled transport vehicle (helicopter or mobile intensive care unit);
  • yes, when the patient will be evaluated in the ED and then further disposition decisions are made.

Is there a specific site to divert to? Options include:

  • yes, (all children under the age of 14 are being diverted to ______ hospital);
  • no, but call us and we may be able to help make decisions with you;
  • no, and we cannot help make decisions (phones, radio and/or staff are unavailable).

Is rendezvous in the parking lot an option?

  • The ED and/or hospital is compromised, but the parking lot available to transfer patients to another hospital with a higher level of care.
  • A vehicle is placed in the parking lot with appropriate staff to perform rendezvous.
  • ED staff available in the parking lot to assist in evaluation, urgent treatment, and the destination decision.
  • EMTALA implications are addressed by good documentation.