Double-reading mammograms may not be better
Double-reading mammograms may not be better
When two radiologists read the same mammogram, they don’t necessarily improve the accuracy of diagnosis of cancer, according to a study at the Medical College of Wisconsin.1
Pairs of radiologists reviewed 79 randomly selected screening mammograms at 24 facilities. On average, the true-positive rate of diagnosis of cancer improved by 8% to 14% while the false-positive rate increased by 4% to 10%. However, in some pairs, the false-positive rate increased significantly more than did the true-positive rate.
Whether two radiologists should pair up to double-read mammograms depends on their "diagnostic concordance" and their individual true-positive and false-positive rates, the researchers concluded.
Reference
1. Beam CA, Sullivan DC, Layde PM. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Academic Radiology 1996; 3:891-897.
Subscribe Now for Access
You have reached your article limit for the month. We hope you found our articles both enjoyable and insightful. For information on new subscriptions, product trials, alternative billing arrangements or group and site discounts please call 800-688-2421. We look forward to having you as a long-term member of the Relias Media community.