Study: Minimally invasive surgery could lower healthcare costs by hundreds of millions a year
A new analysis of surgical outcomes nationwide concludes that more use of minimally invasive surgery for certain common procedures can dramatically reduce postoperative complications and shave hundreds of millions of dollars off the nation’s healthcare bill.
Results of the recent research, conducted by Johns Hopkins investigators and published March 25 in JAMA — Surgery, indicate that hospitals in the United States collectively could prevent thousands of post-surgical complications and save between $280 million and $340 million annually by using more minimally invasive procedures instead of traditional open surgery for routine operations of the appendix, colon, and lungs.
“Minimally invasive surgery, done in the right patients, represents an under-recognized opportunity not only for cost savings, but also for making surgery safer, reducing the very real suffering associated with surgical complications,” says lead investigator Marty Makary, MD, MPH, professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
For the study, the research team analyzed more than 80,000 surgical cases from the National Inpatient Sample database. They tracked seven common post-surgical complications and associated billing charges for certain common operations. The procedures tracked involved operations of the appendix, colon, or lungs, selected because the traditional open and the minimally invasive approaches are considered standard of care.
While not all patients are candidates for minimally invasive treatment, the researchers note, the study revealed great variation in its use among those who do qualify, for similar patients treated at similar hospitals.
To calculate the cost difference between traditional open and minimally invasive surgery, the investigators compared the actual cost for each patient who underwent traditional surgery against the estimated cost for the same patient undergoing minimally invasive treatment. In addition, the investigators calculated potential cost savings under two hypothetical scenarios:
- when all hospitals increased their use of minimally invasive surgery by 50%;
- when the hospitals performing the fewest such procedures, the so-called low utilizers, upped them to the level of hospitals performing in the upper one-third.
The tally showed that if all hospitals in the United States increased the number of minimally invasive procedures by 50%, they would avert 3,578 complications, reduce hospital stays by 144,863 days, and save $288 million a year. If hospitals performing the fewest minimally invasive operations boosted their levels to those of their higher-performing counterparts, the collective savings would be $337 million a year, 4,306 fewer complications, and 169,819 fewer hospital days.
The research team says the findings should be heeded as a call to action by hospital leaders to increase capacity for minimally invasive treatment and create a more streamlined division of labor so that surgeons with expertise in minimally invasive treatment can operate on patients who qualify for this approach. However, the authors caution that minimally invasive surgery is not always the optimal method of treatment.
A new analysis of surgical outcomes nationwide concludes that more use of minimally invasive surgery for certain common procedures can dramatically reduce postoperative complications and shave hundreds of millions of dollars off the nation’s healthcare bill.
Subscribe Now for Access
You have reached your article limit for the month. We hope you found our articles both enjoyable and insightful. For information on new subscriptions, product trials, alternative billing arrangements or group and site discounts please call 800-688-2421. We look forward to having you as a long-term member of the Relias Media community.